What Makes a Store of Value? A Technical Framework

According to the CFA Institute, a store of value must satisfy several criteria:

• scarcity and supply discipline,

• durability over time,

• liquidity and market depth,

• resistance to debasement,

• broad social and institutional acceptance (CFA Institute Research Foundation, 2022).

Gold meets these criteria through physical scarcity, millennia of social consensus, and deep, liquid markets. Bitcoin, by contrast, attempts to meet them through cryptographic scarcity and protocol-enforced rules.

The comparison is therefore not symbolic, it is structural.

Supply Dynamics: Physical Scarcity vs Algorithmic Scarcity

Gold: Scarcity With Elastic Supply

Gold supply grows at approximately 1.5–2.0% per year, driven by mining output and technological improvements. According to the World Gold Council, total above-ground gold stock reached roughly 208,000 tonnes in 2024 (World Gold Council Gold Demand Trends).

While gold is scarce, its supply is price-elastic: higher prices incentivize exploration and production.

Bitcoin: Absolute Scarcity

Bitcoin’s supply is capped at 21 million coins, enforced by protocol-level consensus. The issuance rate halves roughly every four years (“halving”), with the final Bitcoin expected to be mined around 2140.

According to Bitcoin Core, Bitcoin’s monetary policy is the first in history that is:

• transparent,

• predictable,

• immune to discretionary change.

From a purely monetary standpoint, Bitcoin is harder than gold.

Performance and Volatility: Data Tells Two Stories

Long-Term Returns

Between 2013 and 2025:

• Bitcoin delivered compound annual returns exceeding 70%,

• Gold delivered ~6–8% annualized, depending on the base currency.

Data from Bloomberg confirms Bitcoin has been the best-performing asset of the past decade, albeit with extreme volatility.

Volatility and Drawdowns

Volatility is where the divergence becomes critical:

• Bitcoin annualized volatility: 60–80%,

• Gold annualized volatility: 10–15%.

Bitcoin has experienced multiple drawdowns exceeding 70%, while gold’s historical drawdowns are far shallower. According to the Bank for International Settlements, high volatility severely limits Bitcoin’s ability to function as a short-term store of value (BIS Quarterly Review, 2023).

Correlation and Portfolio Behavior Under Stress

Gold has consistently demonstrated negative or low correlation with equities during crises. During inflation shocks, geopolitical stress, and currency debasement episodes, gold typically preserves purchasing power.

Bitcoin’s behavior is more complex. Research by Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis shows that Bitcoin:

• behaves like a risk asset in liquidity stress events,

• correlates positively with equities during market sell-offs.

This undermines the thesis that Bitcoin already functions as a crisis hedge comparable to gold.

Institutional Adoption: The Real Battleground

Gold: Institutional Anchor

Gold is held by central banks, sovereign wealth funds, and pension systems. According to the International Monetary Fund, gold remains a core component of global reserves, particularly among emerging markets seeking to reduce dollar dependence.

Bitcoin: Institutional Entry, Not Institutional Dominance

Bitcoin adoption accelerated following the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in major jurisdictions. Asset managers such as BlackRock and Fidelity now offer regulated exposure.

However:

• no central bank holds Bitcoin as a reserve asset,

• regulatory treatment remains fragmented,

• custody and operational risk remain non-trivial.

According to the European Central Bank, Bitcoin does not currently meet the criteria of a reserve asset due to volatility and governance concerns (ECB Occasional Paper, 2024).

Technological Risk vs Physical Risk

Gold’s risks are largely exogenous: storage, transport, and political confiscation.

Bitcoin’s risks are endogenous:

• protocol risk (low probability, high impact),

• network fragmentation risk,

• regulatory chokepoints (exchanges, custody),

• dependency on digital infrastructure and energy availability.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has also highlighted long-term cryptographic risks tied to quantum computing—still theoretical, but non-zero.

The Most Likely Outcome: Substitution or Coexistence?

From an institutional perspective, Bitcoin is not replacing gold—it is competing for a different role.

Gold is:

• a macro hedge,

• a reserve asset,

• a geopolitical and inflation hedge.

Bitcoin is evolving into:

• a high-conviction asymmetric asset,

• a hedge against fiat debasement for certain investors,

• a generational and technological monetary experiment.

According to the BlackRock Investment Institute, Bitcoin is increasingly treated as a portfolio diversifier, not a gold substitute (BlackRock Global Outlook, 2025).

Conclusion

Bitcoin will not replace gold in the foreseeable future. Gold’s role is institutional, geopolitical, and deeply embedded in the global financial architecture. Bitcoin, however, has established itself as a credible alternative store of value for a subset of investors, particularly in environments of monetary instability and technological trust.

The more realistic trajectory is coexistence, not substitution:

• gold as the anchor of monetary conservatism,

• Bitcoin as the frontier asset of digital scarcity.

For investors, the relevant question is no longer “Bitcoin or gold?” but how each behaves under different regimes of inflation, liquidity, and political stress.

Sources

• CFA Institute, Research Foundation

• World Gold Council, Gold Demand Trends

• Bank for International Settlements, Quarterly Review

• International Monetary Fund, Reserve Asset Reports

• European Central Bank, Occasional Papers

• Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Crypto Research

• BlackRock Investment Institute, Global Outlook

• Bloomberg, Asset Performance Data

GET IN TOUCH

Have a question, a partnership idea, or want to share your thoughts about finance?
At Financia, we value meaningful connections with our readers and collaborators.
Reach out and let’s start a conversation, your insights could inspire our next article.